Page 116 - Changing Living Spaces
P. 116

Josef Grulich


               time, a man was supposed to be able to support a family. At the moment
               of his marriage he was expected already to have a stable income based on
               tenure of a rural landholding, a craft workshop, or a commercial enter-
               prise. This was possible provided that the man owned some property in a
               particular area. Under these circumstances, it was logical that a migrat-
               ing woman would follow her new husband to the locality where the cou-
               ple would then settle.
                 The low number of widowed persons applying for release letters can
               also be explained by property relations. In this case as well, the place of
               residence was more often changed by widows (37 cases, comprising 3.4
               percent of the total) than by widowers (11 cases, comprising 1.0 percent
               of the total).
                 Situations in which several persons applied for release from serfdom in
               a single release letter were quite rare. Among the applicants were child-
               less couples (12 cases, comprising 1.1 percent of the total) and married
               couples with between one and six children (30 cases, comprising 2.8 per-
               cent of the total). It was very exceptional to find applications for change
               of feudal allegiance by a single person accompanied by a child, a widowed
               person, or an unmarried mother (25 cases, comprising 2.3 percent of the
               total). Sibling groups were also not very common among migrants.
               Distance of Migration

               The distance between the place of origin and the target destination could
               be established in about three-quarters of all cases (821, comprising 76.5
               percent of the total). Some serfs applied to change their feudal allegiance
               but then actually remained in the same locality; there were 67 such cas-
               es, comprising 6.2 percent of the total. This situation transpired because
               14 villages of the estate of České Budějovice were divided into multiple
               sections, which were held by different overlords. This meant that serfs in
               that locality were shared among two to six overlords. The most intensive-
               ly divided village was Kamenný Újezd. Serfs from this village were shared
               among the town of České Budějovice, the estate of Český Krumlov, two
               monasteries (Český Krumlov and Vyšší Brod), an archdeaconry (Český
               Krumlov), and a priest via the fabrica ecclesiae. In localities in which serfs
               were shared among several manorial authorities, a serf had to apply for a
               release letter even if he or she was only moving from one house to anoth-
               er within the same village.
                 Although villagers would sometimes move to places far away, in most
               cases they migrated short distances (Hayhoe 2016, 25–9, 59–63). When


               114
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121