Page 47 - Kavur, Boris, Marija Lubšina Tušek, 2016. Na stičišču svetov | On the Crossroad of Worlds. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem | University of Primorska Press.
P. 47
Madžarske in jugozahodne Slovaške; na prostoru Hungary and southwestern Slovakia, southwestern
jugozahodne Češke ter na prostoru zahodne Švice. Czech Republic, and w estern Switzerland. Known
specimens outside these areas originate from Dürrn-
Izven tega področja so znani primerki iz Durrnber- berg, Pottenbrunn and Mannersdorf in Austria, Rast zadnji stiki z zahodom ■ last contacts with the west 45
ga, Pottenbrunna in Mannersdorfa v Avstriji, Rasta in Bavaria and Ptuj. Differences between them are ev-
na Bavarskem ter Ptuja. Razlike med njimi so opazne ident also in the decorative plating on the leg – on the
tudi pri okrasnih oblogah na nogi – na eponimnem eponymous site of Münsingen-Rain, the plate was
najdišču Münsingen-Rein je bila ploščica na nogi ve- mostly decorated with enamel (Hodson 1998), and
činoma okrašena z emajlom (Hodson 1998), češki pri- Czech examples with a slightly thinner bow are dec-
meri, ki imajo tudi nekoliko tanjši lok, pa so okrašeni s orated with fitted plates from materials described by
pritrjenimi ploščicami iz materialov, ki jih je Pavel San- Pavel Sankot as »organic« (Sankot 1998). Jozef Bujna,
kot opisal kot »organske« (Sankot 1998). Jozef Bujna, who mapped them, divided them initially into sever-
ki jih je kartiral, jih je sprva razdelil v več skupin gle- al groups depending on the shape of rivets that hold
de na obliko zakovic, ki držijo emajl oziroma košče- the enamel and according to bone decoration (Bujna
1998) – an element not preserved in the Ptuj find. He
no oblogo (Bujna 1998) – elementa, ki se pri najdbi iz demonstrated that it is this form of Münsingen-type
Ptuja ni ohranil.Pokazal je, da gre za tisto obliko fibule fibula, which appears widespread for the first time in
tipa Münsingen, ki se prvič pojavi razprostranjena na the wider area beginning in Lt B1, specifically in Lt
širšem območju z začetki v času Lt B1, natančneje v B1b, which is the earlier phase of the Dux-Münsin-
Lt B1b, kar predstavlja starejšo fazo horizonta Dux- gen horizon. Variability in their forms, despite signif-
-Münsingen. Variabilnost njihovih oblik pa je kljub icant standardization, is likely the result of their pro-
občutni standardizaciji najverjetneje posledica delo- duction in various workshops. Their locality is also
vanja različnih delavnic, ki so jih izdelovale. Njihovo confirmed by the fact that they have been found in
lokalnost potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da so se v grobovih na graves in different areas in combination with various
različnih območjih nahajale v kombinacijah z različni- forms of ring-shaped jewelry (Bujna 1998). Bujna later
on further elaborated on this topic and divided fibulae
mi oblikami obročastega nakita (Bujna 1998). Kasneje from Slovakia into six groups according to bow shape
je Bujna svojo delitev dodatno preciziral ter fibule na and cross-section, plate size and shape on the foot, and
Slovaškem razdelil v 6 skupin glede na obliko in presek spring execution (Bujna 2003). Having observed it in
loka, velikost in obliko ploščice na nogi ter glede na iz- detail, we can conclude that the fibula from Ptuj does
vedbo tetive (Bujna 2003). Pri natančnejšem opazova- not belong to any of the proposed Slovak groups, since
nju lahko zaključimo, da fibula iz Ptuja ne ustreza naj- all the fibulae of its size (about 6 cm) have a large plate
bolj nobeni od predlaganih slovaških skupin, kajti vse on the foot and a flattened, wide bow.
jugozahodne Češke ter na prostoru zahodne Švice. Czech Republic, and w estern Switzerland. Known
specimens outside these areas originate from Dürrn-
Izven tega področja so znani primerki iz Durrnber- berg, Pottenbrunn and Mannersdorf in Austria, Rast zadnji stiki z zahodom ■ last contacts with the west 45
ga, Pottenbrunna in Mannersdorfa v Avstriji, Rasta in Bavaria and Ptuj. Differences between them are ev-
na Bavarskem ter Ptuja. Razlike med njimi so opazne ident also in the decorative plating on the leg – on the
tudi pri okrasnih oblogah na nogi – na eponimnem eponymous site of Münsingen-Rain, the plate was
najdišču Münsingen-Rein je bila ploščica na nogi ve- mostly decorated with enamel (Hodson 1998), and
činoma okrašena z emajlom (Hodson 1998), češki pri- Czech examples with a slightly thinner bow are dec-
meri, ki imajo tudi nekoliko tanjši lok, pa so okrašeni s orated with fitted plates from materials described by
pritrjenimi ploščicami iz materialov, ki jih je Pavel San- Pavel Sankot as »organic« (Sankot 1998). Jozef Bujna,
kot opisal kot »organske« (Sankot 1998). Jozef Bujna, who mapped them, divided them initially into sever-
ki jih je kartiral, jih je sprva razdelil v več skupin gle- al groups depending on the shape of rivets that hold
de na obliko zakovic, ki držijo emajl oziroma košče- the enamel and according to bone decoration (Bujna
1998) – an element not preserved in the Ptuj find. He
no oblogo (Bujna 1998) – elementa, ki se pri najdbi iz demonstrated that it is this form of Münsingen-type
Ptuja ni ohranil.Pokazal je, da gre za tisto obliko fibule fibula, which appears widespread for the first time in
tipa Münsingen, ki se prvič pojavi razprostranjena na the wider area beginning in Lt B1, specifically in Lt
širšem območju z začetki v času Lt B1, natančneje v B1b, which is the earlier phase of the Dux-Münsin-
Lt B1b, kar predstavlja starejšo fazo horizonta Dux- gen horizon. Variability in their forms, despite signif-
-Münsingen. Variabilnost njihovih oblik pa je kljub icant standardization, is likely the result of their pro-
občutni standardizaciji najverjetneje posledica delo- duction in various workshops. Their locality is also
vanja različnih delavnic, ki so jih izdelovale. Njihovo confirmed by the fact that they have been found in
lokalnost potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da so se v grobovih na graves in different areas in combination with various
različnih območjih nahajale v kombinacijah z različni- forms of ring-shaped jewelry (Bujna 1998). Bujna later
on further elaborated on this topic and divided fibulae
mi oblikami obročastega nakita (Bujna 1998). Kasneje from Slovakia into six groups according to bow shape
je Bujna svojo delitev dodatno preciziral ter fibule na and cross-section, plate size and shape on the foot, and
Slovaškem razdelil v 6 skupin glede na obliko in presek spring execution (Bujna 2003). Having observed it in
loka, velikost in obliko ploščice na nogi ter glede na iz- detail, we can conclude that the fibula from Ptuj does
vedbo tetive (Bujna 2003). Pri natančnejšem opazova- not belong to any of the proposed Slovak groups, since
nju lahko zaključimo, da fibula iz Ptuja ne ustreza naj- all the fibulae of its size (about 6 cm) have a large plate
bolj nobeni od predlaganih slovaških skupin, kajti vse on the foot and a flattened, wide bow.
