Page 170 - Učilnica za življenje

Tina Štemberger and Jurka Lepičnik Vodopivec

Rose,D. H., &A.Meyer (2002). Teaching every studentin thedigital age: Universal
design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Develop-
ment.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimen-
sions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâğitçibaşi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon
(Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp.
85–119). Sage Publications.
UNECE. (2016). UNECE strategy for education for sustainable development: Evalu-
ation report on the implementation of the UNECE Strategy for Education for
Sustainable Development from 2005 to 2015.
UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all; EFA global mon-
itoring report 2013/4.
UNESCO. (2017). Education of sustainable development goals: Learning objec-
tives.
United Nations. (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustain-
able development.
Vukelić, N. (2022). Teacher action competence in education for sustainable de-
velopment. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Peda-
gogika, 73(2), 180–194.
Vukelić, N., & Rončević, N. (2021). Student teachers’ sustainable behavior. Edu-
cation Sciences, 11(12), 789.
Wals, A. E. (2010). Mirroring, Gestaltswitching and transformative social learn-
ing: Stepping stones for developing sustainability competence. Interna-
tional Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 380–390.
Waltner, E. M., Rieß, W., & Mischo, C. (2019). Development and validation of an
instrument for measuring student sustainability competencies. Sustain-
ability, 11(6), 17171.
Watkins, A. (2012). Teacher education for inclusion: Profile of inclusive teachers.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustain-
ability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sus-
tainability Science, 6(2), 203–218.

Validacija slovenske različice Vprašalnika o trajnostnem ravnanju
študentov
Namen raziskave je bil validirati slovensko verzijo Vprašalnika o trajnostnem
ravnanju, ki temelji na socialno-psihološkem modelu trajnostnega ravnanja
(Juares Najera). Vprašalnik sestavljajo štiri lestvice: (i) univerzalne vrednote,
(ii) zavedanje posledic, (iii) pripisovanje odgovornosti, (iv) inter- in intraperso-
nalne inteligentnosti. Za validacijo vprašalnika sta bili uporabljeni analiza po-
sameznih trditev in metoda glavnih kompoment, za preverjanje notranje kon-
sistentnosti pa Cronbachov α-koeficient. Na vzorcu študentov, prihodnjih uči-

170