Page 29 - Herojska doba Histrov

Herojska doba Histrov

Temelj zaporedja raziskovalne poti, ki sta jo predstavili K. S. Kukoč (1987; 2001), and L. Kovač (1993), and many of
Buršić-Matijašić (2007) in K. Mihovilić (2001a; 2014), je the artistic artefacts saw their deserved appreciation
treba nadgraditi z nadaljnjim pogledom na stroko, izposta- in a chapter on the Bronze and Iron ages penned by N.
viti pa je treba tudi četrto, analitično obdobje raziskovanja Majnarić-Pandžić and the first comprehensive overview of
po letu 2000. Namreč, od takrat se je veliko spremenilo, prehistoric art in Croatia (Majnarić-Pandžić 1998). Since
zahvaljujoč obsežnejšim znanstvenim in zaščitnim izkopa- then the Histrian culture has been consistently presented
vanjem. V nasprotju s prejšnjimi obdobji so nove raziskave, at major international symposia and thematic exhibitions,
s sodobnimi dokumentacijskimi metodami in uporabo including the impactful and remarkable 1986 The Histri and
the Etruscans exhibition staged by K. Mihovilić in many
spektra naravoslovnih analiz v končnih interpretacijah, cities in the country and abroad (Mihovilić 1988). This
omogočile dostop do precej večjih količin prostorskih in was followed by the monograph Nesactium: the Find of a
časovnih podatkov, ki so spodbudili temeljne spremembe Tomb in 1981, and the accompanying exhibition, also by K.
v spoznanjih o preteklosti regije in sledi njene kulturne Mihovilić, showcasing a rich trove of artefacts recovered
zgodovine. from the most prestigious of the Nesactium tombs, inves-
tigated, documented, and presented in a manner entirely
Mednarodna sodelovanja so omogočila raziskovanje abreast of modern methodologies (Mihovilić 1996).
gradišč Monkodonja (Hänsel, Mihovilić, Teržan 2015) in
Monbrodo (Müller, Čuka, Hellmuth Kramberger 2016; Hel- Building further on the course of the investigative ground-
work as set out and presented by K. Buršić-Matijašić
lmuth Kramberger, Müller, Čuka 2018) kot tudi brodolom (2007) and K. Mihovilić (2001a; 2014), and with continued
najstarejše šivane ladje v zalivu Zambratija (Koncani Uhač, focus on the métier, the fourth, analytical, phase of the in-
Boetto, Uhač 2017; 2019). Spoznanja o istrski železni dobi vestigative work developed in the period following the year
in Histrih so bila znatno nadgrajena s kataloškimi obja- 2000. Much has, namely, changed since then as a result of
vami starejših izkopavanj, predvsem Nezakcija (Mihovilić comprehensive methodological and rescue archaeology
2001a), nato Kaštelirja pri Novi Vasi (Sakara Sučević 2004), excavation efforts. Unlike the work that preceded it, the
Picugov (Betic 2005; prim. Munda 2009), Kaštela pri Bujah most recent archaeological investigative efforts leverage
(Cestnik 2009) in Limske gradine (Urem 2012). Ta spoz- the latest documentation methods and a broad scientific
nanja so bila dopolnjena z novimi izkopavanji nekropole analytical toolset in its final interpretation, providing a
Rovinja (Matošević, Mihovilić 2004) kot tudi z objavami much greater quantity of spatially and chronologically
številnih manjših izkopavanj posameznih grobov v Sv. Mar- structured data, which has led to fundamental change
tinu nad Limom (Percan 2010), Mariškićih (Mihovilić, Rajić- in relation to our previous understanding of the region’s
-Šikanjić 2016) in Bermu (Višnjić, Cavalli, Percan, Innocenti past and the traces of its cultural history.
2013) ter z zaščitnimi raziskavami železnodobnih plasti v Collaborative investigative work with researchers from
Pulju (Arheološki muzej Istre, četrt sv. Teodora) (Mihovilić abroad was undertaken at the Monkodonja (Hänsel, Miho-
2011; Starac 2009; 2011). Železnodobna gradišča so bila vilić, Teržan 2015) and Monbrodo (Müller, Čuka, Hellmuth
temeljito prikazana v obsežnem pregledu Gradine Istre K. Kramberger 2016; Hellmuth Kramberger, Müller, Čuka
Buršić-Matijašić (2007). Poleg objav preliminarnih rezul- 2018) hillfort sites, and at the site of the remains of our
tatov so pogosto izvajali tudi podrobne analize specifičnih oldest known sewn boat at the Zambratija cove (Koncani
tipov predmetov in skupin najdb (Mihovilić 2000; 2001b; Uhač, Boetto, Uhač 2017; 2019). Our understanding of the
2002; 2003; 2004; 2007a; 2007b; 2007c; 2009a; 2009b; Iron Age in Istria, and of the Histri, saw significant progress
Glogović 2003; Teržan 2007; Buršić-Matijašić 2010; Orlić during this period through the publication of catalogues
2011; Blečić Kavur 2009; 2011; 2012; 2014; 2015; 2017; of artefacts from earlier excavations, above all those at
2019; 2021; 2022a; Blečić Kavur, Kavur 2015). Prikazana Nesactium (Mihovilić 2001a), Kaštelir near Nova Vas (Sa-
kara Sučević 2004), Picugi (Betic 2005; cf. Munda 2009),
količina gradiva z radiokarbonskimi datumi ter rezultati Kaštel near Buje (Cestnik 2009), and the Limska gradina
antropoloških, zooloških, metalografskih in drugih nara- site (Urem 2012). They were supplemented with the re- The Heroic Age of The Histri
voslovnih analiz je posodobila prejšnje teme in sprožila sults of more recent excavation work at the necropolis in
revizijo nekdanjih predpostavk. Rovinj (Matošević, Mihovilić 2004), along with the publi-

Pulj, Dvojna vrata – žgani grobovi Histrov iz izkopavanj leta 2020 /
Pula, Double Gate – Histrian cremation tombs from the 2020 excavations 27