Page 218 - Pedagoška vizija / A Pedagogical Vision
P. 218

Eleonora Doz, Mara Cotič, and Maria Chiara Passolunghi


                       OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They
                          Can Do With What They Know. Paris: OECD.
                       Orrantia, J., L. B. González, and S. Vicente. 2005. ‘Analysing Arithmetic Word
                          Problems in Primary Education Text Books.’ Infancia y Aprendizaje 28:429–
                          451.
                       Pape,S.J.2003.‘CompareWordProblems: ConsistencyHypothesisRevisited.’
                          Contemporary Educational Psychology 28 (3): 396–421.
                       Passolunghi,M.C., andF.Pazzaglia.2005.‘AComparisonofUpdatingProcesses
                          in Children Good or Poor in Arithmetic Word Problem-Solving.’ Learning
                          and Individual Differences 15 (4): 257–269.
                       Passolunghi,M.C., andL. S.Siegel. 2001. ‘Short-Term Memory, Working Mem-
                          ory, and Inhibitory Control in Children with Difficulties in Arithmetic Prob-
                          lem Solving.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 80 (1): 44–57.
                       Passolunghi, M. C., C. Cornoldi, and S. De Liberto. 1999. ‘Working Memory and
                          Intrusions of Irrelevant Information in a Group of Specific Poor Problem
                          Solvers.’ Memory and Cognition 27 (5): 779–790.
                       Passolunghi, M. C., I. Lonciari, and C. Cornoldi. 1996. ‘Abilità di pianificazione,
                          comprensione, metacognizione e risoluzionedi problemiaritmeticidi tipo
                          verbale.’ Età Evolutiva 54:36–48.
                       Passolunghi,M.C., G. D. De Blas, B. Carretti,I.Gomez-Veiga, E.Doz, and J. A.
                          Garcia-Madruga. 2022. ‘The Role of Working Memory Updating, Inhibition,
                          Fluid Intelligence, and Reading Comprehension in Explaining Differences
                          between Consistent and Inconsistent Arithmetic Word-Problem-Solving
                          Performance.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 224 (4): 105512.
                       Peng, P., and D. Fuchs. 2016. ‘A Meta-Analysis of Working Memory Deficits in
                          Children with Learning Difficulties: Is There a Difference between Verbal
                          Domain and Numerical Domain?’ Journal of Learning Disabilities 49 (1): 3–
                          20.
                       Pongsakdi, N., B. Brezovszky, K. Veermans, M. M. Hannula-Sormunen, and E.
                          Lehtinen. 2016. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Word Problems in Selected Thai
                          and Finnish Textbooks.’ In Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the Inter-
                          national Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by C.
                          Csikos, A. Rausch, and J. Szitanyi, 75–82. Szeged: International Group for
                          the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
                       Pongsakdi, N., A. Kajamies, K. Veermans, K. Lertola, M. Vauras, and E. Lehtinen.
                          2020. ‘What Makes Mathematical Word Problem Solving Challenging? Ex-
                          ploring the Roles of Word Problem Characteristics, Text Comprehension,
                          and Arithmetic Skills.’ ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Edu-
                          cation 52 (1): 33–44.
                       Powell, S. R., and L. S. Fuchs. 2018. ‘Effective Word-Problem Instruction: Using
                          Schemas to Facilitate Mathematical Reasoning.’ Teaching Exceptional Chil-
                          dren 51 (1): 31–42.


                  218
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223