Page 258 - Hojnik, Jana. 2017. In Persuit of Eco-innovation. Drivers and Consequences of Eco-innovation at Firm Level. Koper: University of Primorska Press
P. 258
In Pursuit of Eco-innovation
258
Figure 28: Organizational eco-innovation model (standardized solution)
Note: Chi-square = 1982.385 (966 df ); p = 0.00; Goodness-of-fit indexes: NFI = 0.755; NNFI
= 0.860; CFI = 0.869; SRMR = 0.214; RMSEA = 0.075; Reliability coefficients: Cronbach’s alp-
ha = 0.946; RHO = 0.958.
The results of testing hypotheses related to the organizational eco-in-
novation model are depicted in Figure 28. As before, we will first focus on
the hypotheses pertaining to the determinants of organizational eco-in-
novation and then on the hypotheses that pertain to the consequences of
organizational eco-innovation.
Hypotheses 1a and 1b examined the relationships between envi-
ronmental policy instruments (the command-and-control instrument,
the economic incentive instrument) and organizational eco-innovation,
which for both types of environmental policy instruments was predict-
ed to be positive and significant. The standardized coefficients for both
relationships were positive (standardized coefficient was 0.11 for the
command-and-control instrument and 0.09 for the economic incentive
258
Figure 28: Organizational eco-innovation model (standardized solution)
Note: Chi-square = 1982.385 (966 df ); p = 0.00; Goodness-of-fit indexes: NFI = 0.755; NNFI
= 0.860; CFI = 0.869; SRMR = 0.214; RMSEA = 0.075; Reliability coefficients: Cronbach’s alp-
ha = 0.946; RHO = 0.958.
The results of testing hypotheses related to the organizational eco-in-
novation model are depicted in Figure 28. As before, we will first focus on
the hypotheses pertaining to the determinants of organizational eco-in-
novation and then on the hypotheses that pertain to the consequences of
organizational eco-innovation.
Hypotheses 1a and 1b examined the relationships between envi-
ronmental policy instruments (the command-and-control instrument,
the economic incentive instrument) and organizational eco-innovation,
which for both types of environmental policy instruments was predict-
ed to be positive and significant. The standardized coefficients for both
relationships were positive (standardized coefficient was 0.11 for the
command-and-control instrument and 0.09 for the economic incentive
