Page 120 - Istenič Andreja, Gačnik Mateja, Horvat Barbara, Kukanja Gabrijelčič Mojca, Kiswarday Vanja Riccarda, Lebeničnik Maja, Mezgec Maja, Volk Marina. Ur. 2023. Vzgoja in izobraževanje med preteklostjo in prihodnostjo. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem
P. 120
leta Rosanda in Andreja Istenič
puting: Design Thinking and Cultural Computing, uredil M. Rauterberg, 461–
473. Cham: Springer.
Rosanda,V., V. Podpečan in A. Istenič. V tisku. »Social Robots as Radical Innova-
tion: Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge of Capacities and Status Attributed
to the Nao Robot by 11–12 Years Old Students.« Educational Technology Re-
search and Development.
Sandry, E. 2015. »Re-Evaluating the Form and Communication of Social Ro-
bots.« International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (3): 335–346.
Serholt, S. 2018. »Breakdowns in Children’s Interactions with a Robotic Tutor: A
Longitudinal Study.« Computers in Human Behavior 81:250–264.
Serholt, S., W. Barendregt, A. Vasalou, P. Alves-Oliveira, A. Jones, S. Petisca in A.
Paiva. 2017. »The Case of Classroom Robots: Teachers’ Deliberations on the
Ethical Tensions.« AI and Society 32 (4): 613–631.
Serholt, S., W. Barendregt, I. Leite, H. Hastie, A. Jones, A. Paiva, A. Vasalou idr.
2014. »Teachers’ Views on the Use of Empathic Robotic Tutors in the Clas-
sroom.« V The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Inte-
ractive Communication, 955–960. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers.
Sharkey, A. J. C. 2016. »Should We Welcome Robot Teachers?« Ethics and Infor-
mation Technology 18 (4): 283–297.
Smakman M., in E. A. Konijn. 2020. »Robot Tutors: Welcome or Ethically Que-
stionable?« V Robotics in Education, uredili M. Merdan, W. Lepuschitz, G.
Koppensteiner, R. Balogh in D. Obdržálek, 376–386. Cham: Springer.
Smakman, M. H., E. A. Konijn, P. Vogt in P. Pankowska. 2021. »Attitudes Towards
Social Robots in Education: Enthusiast, Practical, Troubled, Sceptic, and
Mindfully Positive.« Robotics 10 (1): 24.
Smith, E. R., S. Sherrin, M. R. Fraune in S. Šabanović. 2020. »Positive Emotions,
More than Anxiety or Other Negative Emotions, Predict Willingness to In-
teract with Robots.« Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 46 (8): 1270–
1283.
Sumakul, D. T. 2019. »When Robots Enter the Classrooms: Implications for Tea-
chers.« V International Conference on Embedding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in
Educational Policy and Practice for Southeast Asia, Jakarta, Indonesia, uredil
R. Alpha Amirrachman, 42-48. Jakarta: Southeast Asian Ministers of Educa-
tion Organisation Regional Open Learning Centre.
Taipale, S., F. de Luca, M. Sarrica in L. Fortunati. 2015. »Robot Shift from Indu-
strial Production to Social Reproduction.« V Social Robots from a Human
Perspective, uredili J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, G. Lugano in L. Fortunati,
11–25. Cham: Springer.
Tuna, G., A. Tuna, E. Ahmetoglu in H. Kuscu. 2019. »A Survey on the Use of Huma-
noid Robots in Primary Education.« Cypriot Journal of Educational Science
14 (3): 361–373.
120
puting: Design Thinking and Cultural Computing, uredil M. Rauterberg, 461–
473. Cham: Springer.
Rosanda,V., V. Podpečan in A. Istenič. V tisku. »Social Robots as Radical Innova-
tion: Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge of Capacities and Status Attributed
to the Nao Robot by 11–12 Years Old Students.« Educational Technology Re-
search and Development.
Sandry, E. 2015. »Re-Evaluating the Form and Communication of Social Ro-
bots.« International Journal of Social Robotics 7 (3): 335–346.
Serholt, S. 2018. »Breakdowns in Children’s Interactions with a Robotic Tutor: A
Longitudinal Study.« Computers in Human Behavior 81:250–264.
Serholt, S., W. Barendregt, A. Vasalou, P. Alves-Oliveira, A. Jones, S. Petisca in A.
Paiva. 2017. »The Case of Classroom Robots: Teachers’ Deliberations on the
Ethical Tensions.« AI and Society 32 (4): 613–631.
Serholt, S., W. Barendregt, I. Leite, H. Hastie, A. Jones, A. Paiva, A. Vasalou idr.
2014. »Teachers’ Views on the Use of Empathic Robotic Tutors in the Clas-
sroom.« V The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Inte-
ractive Communication, 955–960. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers.
Sharkey, A. J. C. 2016. »Should We Welcome Robot Teachers?« Ethics and Infor-
mation Technology 18 (4): 283–297.
Smakman M., in E. A. Konijn. 2020. »Robot Tutors: Welcome or Ethically Que-
stionable?« V Robotics in Education, uredili M. Merdan, W. Lepuschitz, G.
Koppensteiner, R. Balogh in D. Obdržálek, 376–386. Cham: Springer.
Smakman, M. H., E. A. Konijn, P. Vogt in P. Pankowska. 2021. »Attitudes Towards
Social Robots in Education: Enthusiast, Practical, Troubled, Sceptic, and
Mindfully Positive.« Robotics 10 (1): 24.
Smith, E. R., S. Sherrin, M. R. Fraune in S. Šabanović. 2020. »Positive Emotions,
More than Anxiety or Other Negative Emotions, Predict Willingness to In-
teract with Robots.« Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 46 (8): 1270–
1283.
Sumakul, D. T. 2019. »When Robots Enter the Classrooms: Implications for Tea-
chers.« V International Conference on Embedding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in
Educational Policy and Practice for Southeast Asia, Jakarta, Indonesia, uredil
R. Alpha Amirrachman, 42-48. Jakarta: Southeast Asian Ministers of Educa-
tion Organisation Regional Open Learning Centre.
Taipale, S., F. de Luca, M. Sarrica in L. Fortunati. 2015. »Robot Shift from Indu-
strial Production to Social Reproduction.« V Social Robots from a Human
Perspective, uredili J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, G. Lugano in L. Fortunati,
11–25. Cham: Springer.
Tuna, G., A. Tuna, E. Ahmetoglu in H. Kuscu. 2019. »A Survey on the Use of Huma-
noid Robots in Primary Education.« Cypriot Journal of Educational Science
14 (3): 361–373.
120
